I can see how the idea of IV fluids at home might seem like a good idea. While these complications are uncommon, even a small risk isn't worth taking if the treatment is not necessary or helpful. The injection site can become infected, and a vein can become inflamed or blocked with a clot (a condition called superficial thrombophlebitis). Yes, an intravenous treatment of fluid is somewhat invasive. What bothers me is the lack of evidence for an invasive treatment. (Could you tell?) It's not just that I'm a slow adopter (which is true) or that I'm dubious of costly treatments promoted by anecdotes on fancy websites (which I am). If you're too sick to drink and need rehydration, you should get care at a medical facility. If you're able to drink fluids, that's the best way to get them. And while oral fluids are generally recommended for hangover symptoms (among other remedies), dehydration is not the only cause of hangover symptoms.įinally, there's a reasonable alternative to IV fluids: drinking fluids. For example, jet lag is not due to dehydration. While I'm no beauty expert, I doubt that IV fluids will improve the appearance of a person who is well-nourished and well-hydrated to start with.Īnd it's worth emphasizing that the conditions for which the IVs-on-demand are offered are not conditions caused by dehydration or reversed by hydration. Most people who have exercised a lot, have a hangover, jet lag, or the flu can drink the fluids they need. Some people who get the flu (especially the very young and very old) need IV fluids, but they're generally quite sick and belong in a medical facility. Are IV fluids effective or necessary for these things? Many of the early adopters of this new service have been celebrities (and others who can afford it) including Kate Upton, Kim Kardashian, Simon Cowell, and Rihanna.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |